Mr. Rogers, when asked if the election results were nationally valid, replied, “I have no idea and that’s the problem – I don’t know if it was correct.” or not. “
Under state law, the county electoral board will still be responsible for postal and early voting, which the majority of voters in Texas use to vote. But the two systems, experts say, could complicate the process and make it easier for voters to vote twice.
“This opens the door wide to fraud,” said Dr Jones. âThis does not close the door to fraud.
The Texas Secretary of State’s Legal Office, which oversees elections in the state and who was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has raised several concerns about the move.
“Anytime a party holds its own elections rather than signing a contract with a county, it is more confusing for voters,” said Sam Taylor, assistant secretary of state for communications.s. Still, he added that “at the end of the day, it’s their decision to go it alone.”
One of the risks, Mr Taylor said, is that contested race candidates may file election challenges to prompt a court to order new primary elections. “It is not without precedent,” he said. “But county parties usually don’t invite each other this opportunity.”
âThey have all the legal rights to do it,â he added. âWe can’t really intervene.
Melynn Huntley, the Potter County election administrator, said she was baffled by Mr Rogers’ decision and was most concerned about the possibility of facilitating double voting.
âThe biggest worry I have is that these two systems won’t talk to each other,â Ms. Huntley said. âHis desire is to eliminate fraud, but there is a vulnerability in the plan. I wonder if this can work with great integrity.